How do you help people become more emotionally intelligent?
In this educational video, Dr. Mark Scullard, Sr. Director of Product Innovation at Wiley, answers this question by inviting viewers into a research-backed process that leverages the DiSC model to develop emotional intelligence at scale.
Even if we’d never say them out loud, we all have unconscious assumptions that sometimes get us into trouble. Here are some common ones that C-style managers sometimes make.
• If I make a mistake, I’ll lose my credibility
• If people haven’t gotten negative feedback, they will assume they’re doing a good job
• We need all of the information before we make a big decision
• It’s undignified to show intense or tender emotions at work
• Time spent relationship building is largely frivolous
• My judgement is completely objective and unbiased because I use logic
• Emotions have no place in decision making
• There’s one best way of doing things
• If my feedback is objective and fair, I don’t need to cater to people’s feelings
• I need to consider all of the variables before I decide
• You should keep emotions to yourself
• If I make a bad decision for the group, it will never be forgotten
• I’ve thought this through and there’s no better way to see it
Unintended Consequences for Their Team
• We get bogged down in over-analysis
• There’s a lack of shared excitement for our work
• We don’t feel like our hard work is appreciated
• We miss opportunities because we’re too cautious
• Our processes are too rigid
• We don’t feel connected to our teammates
Helping Your C-style Managers Rethink Their Role
These managers often need help appreciating that to grow as a leader, they’ll need to embrace the humanity of their direct reports on a deeper level. By understanding other perspectives, they see that the people they manage often need praise, excitement, optimism, camaraderie, or risk-taking at a much greater level than they do.
Even if we’d never say them out loud, we all have unconscious assumptions that sometimes get us into trouble. Here are some common ones that S-style managers sometimes make.
• It’s my job to keep my team happy at all times
• I shouldn’t upset people
• It’s rude to be too assertive
• If there is uncertainty, inaction is the best course
• If people are sorry, there doesn’t need to be any other consequences
• Direct, critical feedback should only be a last resort
• It’s better to give people what they want than keep fighting
• Slow and steady is better than unpredictability
• I shouldn’t inconvenience other people
• My needs are less important than other people’s
• I shouldn’t push people to push themselves
• You should always give people the benefit of the doubt
• I need buy-in from everyone before I finalize a decision
Unintended Consequences for Their Team
• Problematic behavior doesn’t get called out
• We don’t get the resources we need from upper management
• There’s no sense of urgency
• We don’t get the feedback we need to grow
• There’s no support for big changes
• Decisions take way too long
Helping Your S-style Managers Rethink Their Role
These managers grow as they start to appreciate that sometimes they’ll actually have to invite tension and instability into their world. By understanding other perspectives, they see that not everyone shares their need for harmony and that the long-term well-being of their team often depends on allowing a little short-term messiness.
Even if we’d never say them out loud, we all have unconscious assumptions that sometimes get us into trouble. Here are some common ones that i-style managers sometimes make.
• Most people are fine improvising
• People who are quiet and reserved need to be brought out of their shell
• I have to express my feelings when I have them
• If someone shows confidence, they’re probably competent
• I need to fill the silence to keep things upbeat
• The team should keep things positive, all the time
• I shouldn’t jeopardize my popularity
• It’s ok to build up excitement for an idea, even if it’s only a vague possibility
• Showing my enthusiasm will get everyone excited
• Everyone should assume the best, like I do
• It’s better to move on than dig into problems
• Everyone craves excitement
• If I give critical feedback, our relationship will never recover
Unintended Consequences for Their Team
• We don’t have the stability we need
• We move too fast and quality suffers
• There’s a lot of big talk that goes nowhere
• Problems get glossed over
• Work feels chaotic
• Some of us don’t have the space we need to do our work
Helping Your i-style Managers Rethink Their Role
One of the core insights that helps these managers is realizing just how much more stability, predictability, or control others might need compared to them. By understanding other perspectives, they see that not everyone shares their comfort with improvisation or emotional expression and that sometimes they’ll need to take a more task-oriented or tough-minded approach.
Even if we’d never say them out loud, we all have unconscious assumptions that sometimes get us into trouble. Here are some common ones that D-style managers sometimes make.
• I’m the manager—people need to adapt to me
• Praise should be used very sparingly
• I don’t need to be tactful if I’m being honest
• I can’t show weakness or vulnerability
• People are getting paid—they don’t need morale building
• I’m the best suited to make most decisions
• It’s fine to use a little intimidation to get things done
• People who need emotional support are expecting coddling
• I should be the one in control
• If we get results, that’s what matters
• Everyone should be as driven as I am
• I’m the manager—it’s ok if I lose my temper
• I can’t slow down
Unintended Consequences for Their Team
• We’re burned out
• We don’t dare challenge the boss
• We don’t take risks to innovate
• We waste energy covering our butts
• We hide our mistakes
• We don’t trust the organization
Helping Your D-style Managers Rethink Their Role
A key to developing these managers is helping them truly appreciate the value of empathy in leadership. By understanding other perspectives, they see that not everyone shares their sense of urgency and that they can often get better results in the end by showing compassion in the moment.
At its core, the DiSC® model is designed to be simple to understand and easy to remember. The respondent needs to be able to leave a DiSC experience with clear, simple principles that can be understood and applied in the real world. However, every model and assessment tool is only a simplification of real life. Real life and real people are always much more colorful and diverse, therefore, interpreting anyone’s DiSC results is always a process best done together with the learner.
That is why we now present the last of our 4 hypothetical case studies designed to:
illustrate the relationship between profile results and real-life behavior
model the appropriate interpretation of profile results
Note that these cases include specific characteristics that should not necessarily be generalized to every person sharing a particular style. These are simply one possible manifestation of that DiSC style.
The case study presented here includes the individual’s Everything DiSC map, but also an umbrella graph that shows the person’s scores on the eight DiSC scales and can give a practitioner additional insight into the respondent’s DiSC style. These umbrella graphs are not included in the respondent’s Everything DiSC profile but are available in the Everything DiSC Supplement for Facilitators.
James: S Style
James is a 31-year-old manager in a customer service department. For the past 3 years, he has overseen a team of eight employees, before which he was a customer service representative for 12 years. He is highly regarded among his direct reports for his support and flexibility. Further, they respect his wealth of knowledge about the organization’s products and processes. Several of his direct reports, however, have expressed frustration at his unwillingness to confront team members that are not pulling their weight. Two employees in particular have stopped answering calls when they are busy and this increases the workload on everyone else. The brunt of the extra work, however, has been picked up by James himself. The director of the department is pleased with the consistency of James’ team but notes that he has done little to innovate or advance the group’s productivity, even when given a company mandate to do so.
The assessment indicates that James has a fairly typical S style, with a strong inclination (see Figure 8.10). The umbrella graph shows moderate scores on the C and CD scales and low scores on the D, Di, and i scales (see Figure 8.11). James’ discomfort with interpersonal tension is reflected in his low CD and D scores, and his discomfort with assertiveness is reflected in his low D and Di scores.
James’ willingness to put his own needs aside for the sake of others or for the sake of preserving harmony is typical of the S style. He prefers a calm, peaceful environment where everyone gets along. Consistent with this preference, he has little drive to initiate large-scale change in his department or take chances on untested processes. Likewise, he is very reluctant to push his direct reports to work harder or move outside their comfort zones. As a result, the culture in his team is pleasant and low-key, but not particularly results-oriented.
What else do you read out from his DiSC result? What would you like to ask James if you would be his coach/trainer/manager?
At its core, the DiSC® model is designed to be simple to understand and easy to remember. The respondent needs to be able to leave a DiSC experience with clear, simple principles that can be understood and applied in the real world. However, every model and assessment tool is only a simplification of real life. Real life and real people are always much more colorful and diverse, therefore, interpreting anyone’s DiSC results is always a process best done together with the learner.
That is why we now present the third of our 4 hypothetical case studies designed to:
illustrate the relationship between profile results and real-life behavior
model the appropriate interpretation of profile results
Note that these cases include specific characteristics that should not necessarily be generalized to every person sharing a particular style. These are simply one possible manifestation of that DiSC style.
The case study presented here includes the individual’s Everything DiSC map, but also an umbrella graph that shows the person’s scores on the eight DiSC scales and can give a practitioner additional insight into the respondent’s DiSC style. These umbrella graphs are not included in the respondent’s Everything DiSC profile but are available in the Everything DiSC Supplement for Facilitators.
Amira: i Style
Amira is a 28-year-old nurse practitioner. She’s just started her first job out of school at a large metropolitan hospital and has already made strong connections with most of the people inside her department. Her coworkers find her to be cheerful, warm, and thorough. Her favorite parts of the job are meeting new people, providing support for them, and giving them the medical information that can help relieve their anxiety. Her least favorite part of the job is dealing with a small subset of her coworkers who are cynical, condescending, and sometimes sloppy in their work with patients. Their behavior is deeply unsettling for her, but she does her best to gloss over her objections and remain positive.
Amira’s results suggest that she has an i style, with an additional priority on accuracy (see Figure 8.8). In most instances, extra priorities are adjacent to the solid shading within the Everything DiSC map. As such, Amira’s profile is uncommon, and the conflicting priorities are conceptually more difficult to reconcile compared to a more traditional profile. One theme common among people with this pattern of results is a desire to present a polished appearance. This manifests itself on both a task and interpersonal level. With regard to her work, Amira is attentive to deadlines and ensures that her output is beyond reproach. With regard to relationships, she wants to come across as poised and affable.
Amira has a moderate inclination toward her style. Although she has a clear preference for the i style, the more pronounced characteristics often associated with the i style (e.g., striking up conversations with strangers, being the life of the party) are less likely to be true for her. For instance, although Amira is sociable and has quickly formed relationships with many in her department, she has not necessarily branched out of her department to befriend people with whom she has less frequent contact. The umbrella graph indicates a moderately high score on the C scale (see Figure 8.9), but because she received an extra priority in Accuracy, it is reasonable to assume that she scored high on the Accuracy priority scale in the Workplace assessment. The umbrella graph also shows relatively low scores on the D and CD DiSC scales, which may explain why she prefers to avoid a potentially contentious confrontation with her coworkers, despite being deeply troubled by their behaviors.
What else do you read out from her DiSC result? What would you like to ask Amira if you would be her coach/trainer/manager?
At its core, the DiSC® model is designed to be simple to understand and easy to remember. The respondent needs to be able to leave a DiSC experience with clear, simple principles that can be understood and applied in the real world. However, every model and assessment tool is only a simplification of real life. Real life and real people are always much more colorful and diverse, therefore, interpreting anyone’s DiSC results is always a process best done together with the learner.
That is why we now present the second of our 4 hypothetical case studies designed to:
illustrate the relationship between profile results and real-life behavior
model the appropriate interpretation of profile results
Note that these cases include specific characteristics that should not necessarily be generalized to every person sharing a particular style. These are simply one possible manifestation of that DiSC style.
The case study presented here includes the individual’s Everything DiSC map, but also an umbrella graph that shows the person’s scores on the eight DiSC scales and can give a practitioner additional insight into the respondent’s DiSC style. These umbrella graphs are not included in the respondent’s Everything DiSC profile but are available in the Everything DiSC Supplement for Facilitators.
Rafael: CS Style
Rafael is a 48-year-old insurance claims specialist. He has worked at the same company for the past 9 years and in the same position for the last 6 years. He consistently receives positive reviews on his performance evaluations, and he is regarded as professional and competent by both clients and colleagues. His coworkers see him as the “go-to guy” for answers when they get stuck, and his manager enjoys the fact that she has to spend very little time supervising him. Despite his clear expertise and follow-through, however, Rafael has been passed up for promotion three times; twice these promotions went to colleagues with less seniority and skill than him. In addition, some coworkers feel that he can be unrealistically rigid about procedures. Although he doesn’t force these views on others, they can slow down his team’s progress.
The assessment indicates that Rafael has a CS style, with a strong inclination (see Figure 8.6). Further, his umbrella graph indicates that his pattern of DiSC scale scores is consistent with a strong CS style (see Figure 8.7). That is, he received very high scores on the C, CS, and S scales, moderate scores on the iS and CD scales, and very low scores on the D, Di, and i scales. This profile is associated with someone who is modest, self-controlled, and systematic. Like others with this style, Rafael places a particularly strong priority on stability and accuracy. He takes steps to create a predictable environment for himself and may be overly wedded to systems and routines that provide comfort for him. He has a strong task orientation but is not challenging or argumentative with his colleagues when he disagrees with them. This is largely reflected by his middling placement on the horizontal dimension of the Everything DiSC map (skeptical to accepting), but also by his lower placement on the vertical pace dimension (moderate-paced to fast-paced).
Also consistent with his lower placement on the pace dimension is a relatively passive disposition. He is not highly assertive and does not feel comfortable self-promoting. Likewise, he comes across as soft-spoken and avoids the limelight. As a result, his contributions can be overlooked, and he may not come to mind when the organization’s leadership is trying to identify its high-potential employees.
What else do you read out from his DiSC result? What would you like to ask Rafael if you would be his coach/trainer/manager?
At its core, the DiSC® model is designed to be simple to understand and easy to remember. The respondent needs to be able to leave a DiSC experience with clear, simple principles that can be understood and applied in the real world. However, every model and assessment tool is only a simplification of real life. Real life and real people are always much more colorful and diverse, therefore, interpreting anyone’s DiSC results is always a process best done together with the learner.
That is why we now present the first of our 4 hypothetical case studies designed to:
illustrate the relationship between profile results and real-life behavior
model the appropriate interpretation of profile results
Note that these cases include specific characteristics that should not necessarily be generalized to every person sharing a particular style. In this particular case, for instance, Andrea, who has a D style, is defensive and arrogant about receiving feedback. This should not be taken to mean that every person with a D style is defensive and arrogant in response to receiving feedback. This is simply one possible manifestation of that DiSC style.
The case study presented here includes the individual’s Everything DiSC map, but also an umbrella graph that shows the person’s scores on the eight DiSC scales and can give a practitioner additional insight into the respondent’s DiSC style. These umbrella graphs are not included in the respondent’s Everything DiSC profile but are available in the Everything DiSC Supplement for Facilitators.
Andrea: D Style
Andrea is a 31-year-old medical device salesperson. Over the past eight quarters, she has consistently been among the top five salespeople in her division. She is seemingly fearless when it comes to initiating contact with potential clients and pushing for their business, even in the face of repeated rejection. She particularly enjoys the part of her job that involves charming and persuading others. Some clients, however, have reported that her approach feels manipulative and insincere, and have asked to switch to other representatives from her company. The leadership at her organization has shown concern that her aggressive tactics may be hurting the company’s brand in its tight-knit industry. Her response to this feedback has been perceived as defensive and, to some degree, cocky.
Ultimately, however, her history of results has allowed her to get away with some behaviors that might not be tolerated in others.
The assessment suggests that Andrea has a D style with an extra priority in Enthusiasm and a strong inclination toward her style (see Figure 8.4). Further, the umbrella graph indicates that her pattern of scores on the DiSC scales is as expected for someone with her dot placement and shading (see Figure 8.5). That is, she scored high on the D, CD, Di, and i scales and low on the S, CS, and C scales. This profile is associated with people who are bold, forceful, and enterprising. Her level of drive is typical for people with this style and, given her current level of immaturity, much of her self-worth may be wrapped up in her ability to achieve results. At her current stage of development, she has an exaggerated sense of her own rights, particularly relative to the rights of others. Likewise, she often only shows interest in the emotional experience of other people to the degree that it will help her achieve her goals.
The aspects of her behavior and personality that are entrepreneurial and charismatic are reflected in the extra priority of Enthusiasm. The D style is typically associated with more forceful persuasion tactics, whereas Andrea’s atypical results suggest that she is also accustomed to smooth-talking and charming others. Her approach is still heavy-handed, though, and consequently, she can come across as manipulative in her relationships.
It is important to note that Andrea represents an immature example of the D style. Her arrogance and insensitivity are characteristic of people with the D style who also have a low level of ego integration and self-realization. The Everything DiSC assessment, however, does not measure psychological maturity or emotional intelligence. This is to say, by simply looking at her dot placement and shading, we would not know how healthy or adaptive Andrea’s unique manifestation of the D style is. We would, however, expect to see a predictable pattern of priorities, tendencies, and preferences (e.g., forcefulness, directness).
What else do you read out from her DiSC result? What would you like to ask Andrea if you would be her coach/trainer/manager?
In the last three years, we have seen more glimpses into one another’s personal lives than ever before. How often has someone’s pet (or child!) popped into view on a video call, or have you heard the familiar click of a blinker as a coworker takes a meeting while shuttling the kids to school? It’s not entirely uncommon to get a “decline” for a meeting invitation because it’s during someone’s weekly yoga class or telehealth appointment. What was once seen as verboten in the pre-pandemic workplace is now par for the course in the new employee-centered world of work. Being able to focus more on work/life balance has been an evolution in many organizations and for the most part, people have enjoyed the increased flexibility that keeps them connected to home and wellness while continuing to drive results.
However, the question is – are they driving results? And how does this new people-centric focus affect managers who are learning to walk the fine line between making space for employee well-being while also continuing to meet goals, increase the bottom line, and power their business? We wondered how managers are faring in this new paradigm.
Balancing Well-Being and Results
Wiley Workplace Intelligence surveyed 6,004 individuals, of which 3,363 identify as people managers, to find out how managers, specifically, are coping with these changes. The evolution of leadership from the outdated “command and control” model to a more egalitarian, people-focused, and accessible approach has put unique pressure on those in the middle.
It’s clear that managers are in an increasingly complicated role. While our survey respondents reported facing multiple challenges, balancing employee satisfaction and productivity ranked the highest.
The relationships between people and their managers have also evolved. While these changes have created a more open and progressive dynamic that promotes increased overall job satisfaction due to better communication, it can be challenging for managers to hold people accountable in this new context.
While better work/life balance is the norm, what happens when someone’s weekly yoga class or home life responsibilities are causing them to miss deadlines or decrease the quality of their work? Nearly 20% of managers and supervisors said that holding employees accountable is their biggest challenge, which speaks to the difficulty managers specifically face in holding space for both wellness and results compared to executive-level employees who are more removed from the day-to-day goings-on within the organization.
Making accountability even more tricky is the shocking statistic that 63% of people managers find dealing with interpersonal/attitude issues with their direct reports the most challenging.
There is a clear opportunity here for employees at all levels to reflect on how they are showing up in their relationships at work and with their teams. Additionally, people managers have the opportunity to incorporate well-being initiatives into the process of achieving organizational goals in order to meet employees where they are, while working towards better accountability and consistent results.
Increased Well-Being Leads to Better Results
Despite the manager-specific issues we have outlined here, overall, the new focus on well-being has led to positive changes in the workplace. Almost half of those surveyed, including employees at all levels within the organization, reports that employee wellness has positively impacted performance in their organization.
In this new context, it is important that managers embrace the balance of well-being and results. Working to find ways to make room for well-being while still maintaining high expectations for performance is a key to success. In fact, when managers set an example by leveraging well-being initiatives themselves, it can help combat some of the stress they are feeling as they try to find stability in the new normal.
Whether that means holding firm boundaries around working hours, not working while on vacation (not even that one call you make an exception for!), or participating in wellness initiatives, managers can both lead by example and reap the benefits of a well-being-focused organization.
In fact, building wellness into results by celebrating team accomplishments with rewards like a free afternoon or a fun activity, or treating team objectives like a journey instead of a destination can go a long way in creating a culture that can prioritize both wellness and results. While managers may be under unique pressure, they can also leverage the benefits that are designed to bring increased balance and wellness to the workplace.
Help Your People Work Better Together While Achieving Results
While the world of work is constantly evolving, one thing is certain: strong interpersonal skills are imperative in today’s workplace. Whether it’s to improve communication, encourage accountability and drive results, or increase cohesion on teams, facilitated learning experiences with proven brands like Everything DiSC® and The Five Behaviors® give organizations the tools they need to succeed.
Interpersonal skills don’t necessarily come easily to everyone and need to be learned and practiced like any other skill. Wiley assessment brands bring these skills to life in your organization, helping bridge the gap between results and well-being, proving that your organization can have it all.
This blog content belongs to Everything DiSC, a Wiley brand.